Thanks to
SOH-Dan for posting about
Brandom's current work on Hegel. I remembering hearing maybe five or so years ago
Brandom was writing a book on Hegel's
Phenomenology of Spirit. It was believable since he had already published some articles on Hegel and sections of the
Tales of the Mighty Dead dealt directly with Hegel.
I've wondered what form
Brandom's book would take. Many works on Hegel's
Phenomenology are fairly straight forward commentaries. H. S.
Harris's Hegel's Ladder goes far beyond any of the many commentaries in terms of its detail and comprehensiveness.
Pinkard's is an interesting
Sellarsian take (with some serious
Barndomian influences). But I could not imagine
Brandom taking the time or interest in this kind of
scholarly and reconstructive work. Now after seeing what he's done with Kant and Hegel in his
Woodbridge Lectures, it became clearer there was no chance of this. But how does one write on Hegel's
Phenomenology of Spirit without getting caught in commentary mode. One option is the general
Heideggerian approach: by writing about a historical figure you write a commentary on yourself. Well, after a brief
perusal through Chapter 8 of
Brandom's A Spirit of Trust, the title of what apparently is the long-awaited Hegel book, it seems to be somewhere between the traditional commentary and the
Heideggerian approach (though this is a
fairly speculative comment). There are lots of long quotations interpreted through
Brandom's philosophical framework.
The chapter is itself long (256 pages in Word), so, as
SOH-Dan points out, this will likely rival
Maxing it Explicit in size
, but I wonder to what extent it will
influence how people understand Hegel. My bet is that
Brandom's own philosophical work on
inferentialism, semantics and
normativity will have a greater
influence on
Idealism studies than his own
commentaries on Hegel or Kant. There is some historical precedence for this. Look at the influence
Sellars has had on Kant studies or even McDowell.
Strawson's work on Kant might be an exception but the debate over transcendental arguments, one of his greatest legacies, stems originally from
Individuals and not the
Bounds of Sense. But maybe I'm overstating things in the case of
Strawson, he did after all make it
permissible, along with Bennett, for Anglo-
American philosophers to take Kant seriously. Anyway, these are just some cursory half-thoughts.
You should checkout
Brandom's very funny "Untimely Review of Hegel's
Phenomenology of Spirit."
Brandom's so-called review can be found
here on his webpage, and his chapter along with other Hegel papers
here.